profession of pharmacy has not routinely used superbills in the past; however, given the recognition of pharmacists as providers of medication therapy management (MTM) services, immunizations, disease management, and other specialty preventive health services, the time has come for pharmacists to begin using superbills.
Main outcome measures: Not applicable.
Results: A sample superbill, suitable for adaptation by individual providers of medication therapy management and other clinical pharmacy services, is provided in this article.
Conclusion: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/z-vad(oh)-fmk.html Superbills may or may not improve the pharmacist’s overall ability to receive insurance find more remuneration, but the authors believe that greater recognition by patients of the nondispensing activities of pharmacists can be achieved by using a superbill and that this may lead to more opportunities for payment for MTM in the future. Research is needed to assess whether incorporating superbills into a variety of pharmacy practice settings improves patient perceptions of the pharmacist and to discover how superbills effect practice efficiency.”
“Background: The causes
of ovarian cancer are complex and may be influenced by many factors, including polymorphism in the microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) gene. Previous work suggests an association between the Tyr113His mEH polymorphism rs1051740 and susceptibility to ovarian cancer, but the results have been inconsistent.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify https://www.sellecn.cn/products/chir-99021-ct99021-hcl.html relevant studies. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between Tyr113His mEH polymorphism and susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results: Five studies involving 2,566 cases
and 2,839 controls were included. Although the polymorphism did not affect ovarian cancer risk in the allelic contrast model (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.83-1.17, P = 0.86), the mutant CC genotype was significantly associated with increased risk in the homozygote comparison (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.01-1.43, P = 0.04) and recessive genetic models (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.01-1.41, P = 0.03). The wild-type TT genotype was not associated with higher or lower ovarian cancer risk in the dominant genetic model (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.83-1.29, P = 0.74). These results were robust to sensitivity analysis.
Conclusions: The CC genotype of Tyr113His mEH may confer increased risk of ovarian cancer. These conclusions should be verified in large and well-designed studies.