The samples were reconstituted with 2 mL of 2.5% acetic acid and methanol (3:1, v/v) and filtered through a 0.22 μm (Nylon) syringe filter (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) prior to analysis. The total phenolic content (TPC) DZNeP was determined by colorimetric analysis using Folin–Ciocalteau reagent, as described by Singleton and Rossi

(1965). In a test tube, 8.4 mL of distilled water, 100 μL of sample, and 500 μL of Folin–Ciocalteau reagent were added. After 3 min, 1.0 mL of 20% sodium carbonate was added into each tube, which was agitated in a vortex (Vision Scientific CO. LTD., Korea). After 1 h, the absorbance (720 nm) was measured by spectrophotometer (model Mini UV 1240, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The measurement was compared to a calibration curve of chlorogenic acid [total phenolic concentration = 1473.3 × absorbance; R2 = 0.998; p < 0.001] and the results were expressed as milligrams of chlorogenic acid equivalents (CAE) per kilogram of apple [mg CAE/100 g]. The total flavonoid content (TFC) of the phenolic extracts was determined using a method described by Zhishen, Mengcheng, and Jianming (1999)

with modifications. 250 μL of the samples was mixed with 2.72 mL of ethanol (30%, v/v) and 120 μL of sodium nitrite solution (0.5 mol/L). After 5 min, 120 μL of aluminum chloride (0.3 mol/L) was added. The mixture was stirred and was allowed to react for AZD2281 molecular weight 5 min. Then, 800 μL of sodium hydroxide (1 mol/L) was added and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm using a spectrophotometer (model Mini UV 1240, Dichloromethane dehalogenase Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The measurement was compared to a calibration curve of catechin (CT) [flavonoid concentration = 755.37 × absorbance; R2 = 0.996; p < 0.001] and the results were expressed as milligrams of catechin equivalents (CTE) per kilogram of apple [mg CTE/100 g]. Free-radical scavenging

activity of the extracts was determined in triplicate by the DPPH assay according to the Brand-Williams method, Brand-Williams, Cuvelier, and Berset (1995) with minor adaptations. This method determines the hydrogen donating capacity of molecules and does not produce oxidative chain reactions or react with free radical intermediates. Diluted samples (100 μL) were mixed with 3.9 mL of 60 μmol/L methanolic DPPH. The absorbance was measured at 515 nm using a spectrophotometer (model Mini UV 1240, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) after the solution had been allowed to stand in the dark until stabilisation (time previously determinated). Antiradical capacity was defined as the amount of apple necessary to decrease the DPPH concentration by 50%, EC50. The lower the EC50, the higher the antioxidant power. The total antioxidant potential of the extracts was determined in triplicate using the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay as described by Benzie and Strain (1996) with minor modifications.