All tested infants were born full-term, 37–41 weeks. Written informed consent was collected from all participants’ parents. Fifty-five infants (33 females) with an average age of 4 months and 12 days (age range: 4 months and 0–30 days) were included in the final sample (31 infants in the eye gaze condition, 24 infants in the head condition). They were randomly VX-809 chemical structure assigned to the eye gaze or head
condition. Another 39 infants had to be excluded because of technical problems with the eye-tracking software resulting in a failure to record data properly. Three infants could not be included due to providing too few analyzable trials. Stimulus presentation and procedures for eye tracking are similar to the ones reported by Wahl et al. (2012). In the eye gaze condition, infants were presented with a person gazing straight ahead and a pair of objects on the learn more right and left side for 1000 ms. The person then shifted gaze toward one of the objects for 1000 ms. The last frame with the person looking at the object was held for 1000 ms. Then, a rotating star appeared in the middle of the screen for 2000 ms to redirect infants’ attention to the center. Afterward, only the objects were presented
again for 10 seconds in a paired preference test (see Figure 1 for an example of a trial). In half of the trials, object locations were switched between cueing phase and test. A total of 24 different toys were scaled to a maximum width of 5.5° (5.8 cm) and height of 6.3° (6.6 cm), all covering a similar area. The person’s head was 12.1° (12.7 cm) wide and 15.8° (16.6 cm) high. Twelve trials were presented in a semi-randomized order in which cue direction to the left and right side was balanced, Olopatadine as well as object location in the paired preference test (same versus switched). Furthermore,
cued and uncued objects were located on the left or right side equally often. For statistical analyses, each infant contributed on average seven trials. In the head condition, the procedure was identical, with the only difference that the person turned her head toward one of the objects while constantly keeping her eyes gazing toward the front. On average, infants contributed eight trials for statistical analyses in this condition. Trials were presented on a Tobii T60 eye-tracking monitor using Tobii Studio software (Tobii Technology AB, Danderyd, Sweden). Data were filtered using Tobii fixation filter with a fixation radius of 0.9°. A standard Tobii 5-point infant calibration procedure was applied. For the paired preference test, rectangle areas of interest (AOIs) were defined covering each object (6.3 × 8.3°). Visual preference for the previously cued or uncued object during the paired preference test was analyzed using relative fixation length (cumulative fixation length within the AOI relative to the overall fixation length to the screen).