Further, the amount of information available varied tremendously by country

with the most information available on the processes in Australia, Canada, the UK, and the USA for which the information described was fairly comprehensive. The main limitation of this review is that only publications, reports and websites in English or French were included in the review. There is likely to be additional information available on the processes of immunization policy making at a national level published in languages other than English or French, particularly on national websites, though we were unable to determine to what extent. The assessment of the quality of information is another limitation of this study. Although the source and date of publication were documented,

this website national policy making processes may have changed over time and it is unknown if the methods employed in the past remain the same today. As well, there are many varying perspectives of players involved in immunization policy development that may not have been reflected in the published literature due to the small number of publications and limited information provided. Granted the above-mentioned limitations, the lack of detailed information retrieved in print and on the web points to a need for countries to enhance dissemination of information on their immunization policy making processes. This exchange of information could help countries improve Bleomycin concentration their policy making processes by offering concrete examples of feasible policy making methods. Also, governments publishing their decision making processes would increase the credibility and transparency of immunization policy development. The information retrieved about the immunization policy making processes came mostly from industrialized countries [39], however, there was

information about four countries considered to be developing (Brazil, China, Papua New Guinea, and Thailand) and two countries considered to be least developed (Cambodia Florfenicol and Mali). For the developing and least developed countries, the information retrieved briefly described the players involved and factors considered when making immunization policies. Overall, there was little information available about the processes of immunization policy development particularly in developing countries. The 14 countries with NITAGs for which information was retrieved in this review are all developed with the exception of Brazil. Brazil is considered a developing country by the United Nations [39], but is known for its strong public health system. Although there are presumably many NITAGs in existence, only 14 were identified in print literature and country websites and limited information about them was published. There is little published or easily accessible website information on the NITAGs outside of those in Australia, Canada, the UK, and the USA, at least in the English and French languages.