\n\nAdditional Information Please access these websites via the online version of this summary at http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.neu.edu/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001588.\n\nThe US National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse provides information about diabetes for patients, health care professionals, and the general public (in English and Spanish)\n\nThe UK National Health Service Choices website provides
information (including some personal stories) for patients and carers about type 2 diabetes, the commonest form of diabetes\n\nThe Canadian Diabetes Association also provides information about diabetes for patients (including some personal stories about living with diabetes) and health care professionals; its latest clinical practice guidelines are available on its website\n\nThe UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence provides general information about clinical guidelines Quisinostat chemical structure MI-503 concentration and about health care quality standards in the UK\n\nThe
US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality aims to improve the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care for all Americans (information in English and Spanish); the US National Guideline Clearinghouse is a searchable database of clinical practice guidelines\n\nThe International Diabetes Federation provides information about diabetes for patients and health care professionals, along with international statistics on the burden of diabetes”
“PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of altering microkeratome parameters (oscillation rates see more and head-advance speeds) and repeated blade use on human and porcine laser in situ keratomileusis interface surface quality and to evaluate correlations between human and porcine
interface surface quality.\n\nSETTING: Emory Vision, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.\n\nMETHODS: Corneal flaps were created in porcine eyes and human cadaver eyes with an Amadeus I microkeratome using varying head-advance speeds and oscillation rates. Microkeratome blades were used once in 18 porcine eyes, twice in 18 human eyes (simulating clinical use), and 5 times in 15 porcine eyes. The interface surface was imaged with electron microscopy, with overall bed quality and surface smoothness graded from 1 to 5 (smoothest to roughest) by 5 masked corneal specialists using the same grading criteria for porcine eyes and human eyes.\n\nRESULTS: Neither oscillation rates nor head-advance speeds consistently influenced bed smoothness in any group. There were no differences in bed quality between first cuts and second cuts in human eyes or between porcine eyes with multiple blade use. Porcine eyes had statistically significantly smoother stromal beds than human eyes (P<.01); there was no correlation between porcine eye scores and human eye scores (r = -0.1).