The purpose of this study was to assess whether the incidence and severity of pain during peritoneal
sac traction is decreased by addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia.
Methods: Children (6-14 years) were randomized into two groups. Group Stem Cell Compound Library supplier F (n = 25): hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.2 mu g.kg(-1) of fentanyl. Group P (n = 25): hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.9% NaCl (placebo). The dose of bupivacaine was 0.4 mg.kg(-1). The primary variable was the incidence and severity of pain during peritoneal sac traction. Spinal block characteristics, duration of spinal anesthesia assessed by recovery of hip flexion and duration of analgesia were the secondary variables measured, and the side effects were noted.
Results: There were significant differences in GW4869 cost incidence of pain and pain scores during sac traction with lower incidence and scores in the fentanyl group (P = 0.009). Two groups were similar regarding the level of sensory block during sac traction and duration of spinal anesthesia. Duration of spinal analgesia was prolonged significantly in the fentanyl group (P = 0.025).
Conclusion: Intrathecal fentanyl at a dose of 0.2 mu g.kg(-1) added to bupivacaine significantly improves
the quality of intraoperative analgesia and prolongs postoperative analgesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia.”
“Objective: To evaluate the effect of a medication therapy management (MTM) intervention on adverse drug events (ADEs), health care visits, and drug-related problems (DRPs).
Design: Randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
Setting: Academic medical center community pharmacies and family medicine clinics find more at three U.S. sites between December 2007 and January 2010
Patients: Individuals aged 65 years
or older with three or more chronic illnesses, six or more prescription medications, and at risk for a DRP.
Intervention: At 0 and 3 months, pharmacists conducted comprehensive medication reviews and screened for and resolved DRPs through patient education and recommendations to physicians.
Main outcome measures: Frequency of ADEs reported by patients and confirmed by clinical algorithm, health care visits at 3 and 6 months, and number of DRPs, pharmacist recommendations, and medication discrepancies.
Results: 637 participants enrolled. No differences were observed in potential ADEs or health care visits among the usual care and MTM groups. DRPs declined in both MTM intervention groups over time. Physicians responded to 54.6% of pharmacist recommendations. Enhanced MTM patients had fewer medication list discrepancies than basic MTM patients (33.8% vs. 47.1%, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: This specific design of MTM was associated with reduced DRPs but did not reduce potential ADEs or health care visits.