This produced smaller particles with superior yields. It was also observed that GANT61 price Formulation variables lying outside the selected limits (Table 4) resulted in nanoparticles with a high degree of aggregation. Based on the resultant responses obtained for the various formulations, the target particle size, MTX entrapment efficiency,
and the yield were assigned for the optimization process. The requisite variables revealed optimized formulations with a particle size of 313nm, yield of 85.5mg, and a DEE value of 9.45% (Figure 1). Figure 1 Desirability plots depicting the requisite variables for producing PLA/MAA nanoparticles with the desired targeted responses. Table 3 Response data obtained for the 3-factor Box-Behnken experimental design
Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical PLA-MAA nanoparticle formulations. Table 4 Formulation constraints employed for response optimization. 3.2. Effects of Formulation Variables on Nanoparticle Size and Zeta Potential Nanoparticle size is an important parameter since it affects the MTX loading, drug release, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and eventual site-specific delivery of MTX across the BBB. The nanoparticle sizes obtained from the experimental design formulations varied between 211.0 and 378.3nm (Figure 2(a)). Formulations Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical displayed polydispersity index (PdI) values of <0.5 which was an indication of a homogenous nanoparticle size distribution. The size distribution measurement indicated that the size of the optimized nanoparticles was 331nm (Figure 2(b)). It was observed that the size of the optimized nanoparticles was reduced to 211nm upon incubation in a concentrated
MTX solution in an attempt to improve Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the MTX-loading capacity (Figure 2(c)). This effect was due to the insolubility of PLA and MAA in 50% methanol that resulted in nanoparticle size shrinkage. The reduction in size could have further been Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical enhanced by the evaporation of the volatile solvent phase from the surface of the nanoparticles during the drying phase. Response surface plots showed that an increase in the quantity of PLA resulted in an increase in the nanoparticle size. However, an increase in the quantity of MAA had an antagonistic effect and resulted in a decrease in nanoparticle size. The phase volume ratio had no significant influence about on the nanoparticle size. This was further evidenced by the residual plots of the particle size distribution (Figure 3). The absolute zeta potential values ranged from −0.048mV to −1.070mV. These zeta potential values indicate that the MTX-loaded PLA-MAA nanoparticles were fairly stabilized by electrostatic repulsion forces but may have the tendency to aggregate. For PCNSL therapeutic interventions, the optimized nanoparticles (211nm) may be optimal for penetration into the neuronal-cellular architecture considering a pore size of 100–150nm at the site of action [43]. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration also needs to be considered as nanoparticles with a size >200nm may not be able to penetrate through the BBB.