Whether OFC is able to select the appropriate task structure or just applies this information computed by other frontal cortical regions

Rapamycin price is not yet known; as is shown in Figure 1B, encoding of decision type predominated across multiple regions of frontal cortex and was not unique to OFC. What is evident is that OFC can utilise information about task structure to promote rapid contingent learning. Unlike research into OFC function, evidence for the role of VMPFC in value-guided decision making has to date been largely driven by human studies. The BOLD signal in this region has often been shown to correlate with the current subjective value of various different types of options

33, 34 and 35]. This holds true even in the case where the particular item has never previously been directly experienced [36]. However, as with the OFC, the functional role of VMPFC value signals remains disputed. Representations of decision value are evident in many brain regions [37], thus an important question is to identify a neural signature of a decision. A version of PI3K Inhibitor Library cell assay a biophysically plausible attractor network model of a binary probabilistic choice process [38] suggests decision inputs (values) are initially summed, and then compete via mutual inhibition, producing a later, second signal reflecting the difference in value between the chosen and unchosen options [39••]. Critically, VMPFC activity contained both such signatures in the correct timeframe [39••]. In fact, in many situations when two choice options are presented, the BOLD signal in this region not only correlates positively with the subjective value of a chosen, attended

option, but also negatively with the value filipin of the next best, but rejected option 40, 41 and 42]. Recently, Strait and colleagues have reported comparable antagonistic effects between the values of two sequentially presented options in area 14 in macaques [43•]. Together, this evidence points towards an important role for VMPFC in a competitive value comparison necessary for decision making 3 and 39••]. Nonetheless, while VMPFC activation is common to a range of studies (outside the domain of decision making as well as within), it is not a signature of all decisions and is instead critically dependent on the local context. For instance, VMPFC value comparison signals are not observed when selecting whether to take an available option or to forego this to search for something better in the environment; only when a decision is made to engage with the current option does the VMPFC BOLD signal represent the value of this chosen item [44].