, 1996 and Graf, 1999), but they have had a dramatic effect on river form and function. Dam effects on river Duvelisib clinical trial morphology and fluvial processes have become increasingly important to watershed management during recent decades. Flow regimes, channel morphology, sediment transport, and ecological processes such as the quality of riparian and aquatic habitats have been influenced by dams (Heinz Center, 2002). The downstream impact of dams is well documented (Williams and Wolman, 1984, Brandt, 2000, Fassnacht et al., 2003, Grant et al., 2003, Graf, 2006, Petts and Gurnell, 2005, Schmidt and Wilcock,

2008 and Hupp et al., 2009). Several authors have developed generalized conceptual models of the downstream effects of dams on rivers (Brandt, 2000, Grant et al., 2003 and Schmidt and Wilcock, 2008). The fundamental cause of channel change is the imbalance between sediment supply and stream flow, leading to post-dam sediment deficit or surplus and channel change that can persist for hundreds of kilometers downstream (Schmidt and Wilcock, 2008). Because of the differing degree of these imbalances (due to varying watershed, climate, and dam characteristics), channel adjustments downstream of dams are often complex. Previous

work emphasizes the variability of downstream channel response which include bed degradation and narrowing, changes in channel bed texture check details or armoring, bed aggradation, bar construction, channel widening (Williams and Wolman, 1984 and Brandt, 2000), or no measurable change 5-Fluoracil (Fassnacht et al., 2003 and Skalak et al., 2009). Bed degradation, in some instances, can persist for decades and extend spatially from a few kilometers to as far as 50 km or more (Williams and Wolman, 1984). Bed degradation downstream of the Hoover Dam extended more than 120 km thirty years after dam closure (Williams and Wolman, 1984). Hupp et al. (2009) also suggest that impacts on channel morphology on the Roanoke River are measurable 150 km downstream of the dam. A

wide variety of controls have been identified that create a diverse range of geomorphic responses for channels downstream of dams (Grant et al., 2003). Previous research suggests that sediment loads downstream of dams require long distances to recover. Williams and Wolman (1984) state that the North Canadian River required more than 182 km and possibly as much as 500 km of channel distance to provide enough sediment to have pre-dam concentrations. On the Missouri River (8 km downstream from Gavins Point dam), post-dam sediment load is 1% of pre-dam conditions; 1147 km downstream of Gavins Point dam the post-dam load is only 17% of pre-dam loads (Jacobson et al., 2009 and Heimann et al., 2011). Data for the Nile River in Egypt show that 965 km downstream from the dam, post-dam loads are only 20% of pre-dam conditions (Hammad, 1972).