54 and 7.92 min with their relative amplitude of a1 = 0.291
and a2 = 0.709, which are similar to those values obtained in the absence of scavengers. The difference in the amount of bound metal complex to dsDNA can be the reason for the different cleavage efficiencies. Therefore, the binding affinities of the M(bpy)2 complexes to dsDNA were examined by the absorption spectrum. The Cu(bpy)2 complex produced an absorption peak at 311 nm in the absence of dsDNA, which decreased with increasing dsDNA concentration (Fig. 7). An increase in dsDNA concentration also caused an increase in absorbance at long wavelength. This changes were accompanied by an isosbestic point at 316 nm, suggesting that a change in absorption spectrum occurred Selleck PARP inhibitor between the two states, namely dsDNA bound and free Cu(bpy)2. If this change occurs between the two states, the equilibrium constant can GSK2126458 research buy be calculated using a simple Benesi–Hildebrand equation. 1ΔA322nm=−1εb−εfLt+1εb−εfLtKBHdsDNA. In this equation, the molar extinction coefficient and the subscripts b, f and t denote the bound, free and total metal complexes, respectively. [Lt] and ΔA322 nm are the total complex concentration and change in absorbance at 322 nm, respectively. The association constant for the dsDNA-Cu(bpy)2 complex adducts formation, KBH, was calculated from the slope to intercept ratio of the Benesi–Hildebrand
plot of the reciprocal absorbance with respect to the reciprocal DNA concentration ( Fig. 7, insert). The association constant for the formation of the dsDNA-Cu(bpy)2 adduct was 7.4 × 103 M− 1. Values Orotidine 5′-phosphate decarboxylase of 3.2 × 103 M− 1 and 2.1 × 103 M− 1 were obtained for the Zn(bpy)2 and Cd(bpy)2 complex, respectively, using a similar approach (Figs. S1 and S2). The redox potentials of the M(bpy)2 complexes
may also be an important property that affects oxidative dsDNA cleavage. Fig. 8a and b shows the cyclic voltammograms and square wave voltammograms of the metal complexes, respectively. The redox potential for the Cu(bpy)2 complex using a glassy carbon electrode was observed at − 0.222 V vs. Ag/AgCl electrode with a peak to peak separation of 0.201 V (Ered = − 0.021 V) in a pH 7.0 buffer containing 0.1 M sodium phosphate and 2.5 mM cacodylate (curve a, panel a). A shoulder in the oxidation curve at − 0.070 V was also noted. The observed redox potential for the Cu(bpy)2 complex may correspond to the following reaction. Cu(II) + e− ⇌ Cu(I) In contrast, neither the Zn(bpy)2 nor Cd(bpy)2 complexes exhibited redox activity in the potential range tested in this study. The square wave voltammograms for the Cu(bpy)2 complex (curve a, panel b) produced a peak potential at − 0.175 V with a peak half-width of approximately 0.145 V. In addition to the cyclic voltammogram, no significant peak for the Zn(bpy)2 or Cd(bpy)2 complex was found, which is in contrast to the Cu(bpy)2 complex case.